Real Feedback From Financial Analysts Like You

We've been teaching valuation methods since 2019, and honestly, the best part isn't the models or spreadsheets. It's hearing from people who took what they learned and applied it somewhere real. These are actual comments from analysts who've gone through our programs—some thrived, others had mixed experiences. We're sharing both because transparency matters more than polish.

What Previous Participants Say

We asked past students to share their honest thoughts. Some responses surprised us. Not everyone loved every aspect, and that's okay—it helps us improve.

Brynn Ellis profile photo

Brynn Ellis

Equity Research Associate

The DCF section completely changed how I approach company valuations. Before this, I was copying formulas without understanding the assumptions underneath. Now I can defend my models in team meetings, which has been huge for my confidence.
Isla Redmond profile photo

Isla Redmond

Corporate Finance Analyst

I'll be honest—the first two modules felt slow. But once we hit comparable company analysis, everything clicked. The case studies from actual Australian companies helped me see patterns I'd missed working with international examples. Worth sticking through the intro material.

Learning That Fits Around Your Schedule

Most people who sign up for our programs are already working full-time. That's why we built everything around flexibility. You get access immediately, and there's no deadline pressure—work through materials when it makes sense for your life.

Some finish in three months. Others take eight. A few people from the 2024 cohort are still working through advanced modules because their workload got crazy. And that's completely fine. Life doesn't pause for professional development.

We update content every quarter based on regulatory changes and market shifts. So even if you took longer than expected, you're not learning from outdated examples.

Financial analyst reviewing valuation models on screen
87% Completion Rate for 2024 Cohorts
4.3/5 Average Program Rating
620+ Analysts Trained Since 2019

How Our Review Process Works

We collect feedback at specific points during the program. Here's when and how we gather the comments you're reading on this page.

1

Mid-Program Check-In

Around week six, we send a short survey. This is when most people have formed initial impressions but haven't completed everything yet. Responses here tend to be more critical, which is actually helpful for us.

2

Post-Completion Survey

After finishing the final assessment, participants get a longer questionnaire. We ask specific questions about content clarity, practical application, and whether they'd recommend the program to colleagues.

3

Six-Month Follow-Up

This is where we learn the most. Six months out, people have had time to apply techniques at work. We ask if the material held up in real scenarios and what gaps they noticed after the fact.

4

Public Sharing Permission

We only publish reviews after getting explicit written consent. Names and employers are shared exactly as participants specify—some prefer first name only, others are comfortable with full details.

Ready to Start Your Program?

Our next program intake opens in September 2025. Enrollment is limited to 40 participants per cohort to maintain quality interaction. If you're interested, we recommend reviewing our curriculum details and pricing structure first.

View Program Options